Antworten

Der Beitrag verursachte die folgenden Fehler, die behoben werden müssen:
Achtung: In diesem Thema wurde seit 120 Tagen nichts mehr geschrieben.
Solltest du deiner Antwort nicht sicher sein, starte ein neues Thema.
Achtung: Dieser Beitrag wird erst angezeigt, wenn er von einem Moderator genehmigt wurde.
Einschränkungen: maximale Gesamtgröße 200 MB, maximale Individualgröße 200 MB
Deaktiviere die Dateianhänge die gelöscht werden sollen
Ziehen Sie Ihre Dateien hierhin oder benutzen Sie den Button, um Dateien hinzuzufügen.
Erweiterte Optionen...
Shortcuts: mit Alt+S Beitrag schreiben oder Alt+P für Vorschau

Zusammenfassung

Autor Jake
 - 31. Juli 2023, 07:58:45
💣 Der ,,Big Push" der Ukraine führt zu großen Verlusten, da die Offensive sich dem zweiten Monat nähert
💣 Ukraine's "Big Push" Results in Big Losses as Offensive Nears 2 Months


- Ukraine's "big push" over the past week has resulted in minimum gains and massive losses;

- Ukraine's "big push" followed weeks of exercising an alleged "artillery advantage" used to soften Russian defenses;

-  Western analysts used the same flawed process to assess Ukraine's artillery capabilities they used to assess the supposed likelihood NATO armor would cut through Russian defenses;

- The US rushing M1 Abrams main battle tanks to Ukraine by fall will make no difference on the battlefield, they are too few in number and no more capable than the German Leopard 2 tanks Ukraine has used in a so-far failed offensive;

- Russian defenses are layered specifically to absorb Ukrainian advances and preserve Russian manpower and equipment as they move back to successive lines of defenses;

- Ukraine's attempt to gain territory amid a war of attrition is only accelerating its own defeat;

- A German army report blaming Ukrainian soldiers for the poor outcomes of the offensive is an unfair attempt to shift blame away from NATO; 
- Ukraine's "big push" over the past week has resulted in minimum gains and massive losses;

- Ukraine's "big push" followed weeks of exercising an alleged "artillery advantage" used to soften Russian defenses;

-  Western analysts used the same flawed process to assess Ukraine's artillery capabilities they used to assess the supposed likelihood NATO armor would cut through Russian defenses;

- The US rushing M1 Abrams main battle tanks to Ukraine by fall will make no difference on the battlefield, they are too few in number and no more capable than the German Leopard 2 tanks Ukraine has used in a so-far failed offensive;

- Russian defenses are layered specifically to absorb Ukrainian advances and preserve Russian manpower and equipment as they move back to successive lines of defenses;

- Ukraine's attempt to gain territory amid a war of attrition is only accelerating its own defeat;

- A German army report blaming Ukrainian soldiers for the poor outcomes of the offensive is an unfair attempt to shift blame away from NATO;